Welcome, patriots! We're launching a movement like never before, and it's time to keep America great in 2028. Our campaign is built on truth, strength, and unwavering dedication to the American people. Here, you'll find the latest news and facts about our mission to continue the incredible progress we've made together.
Stay informed, stay engaged, and join us in making history once again. Together, we'll ensure that America's best days are still ahead. Believe me, folks, the future is bright, and we're just getting started.
New Stories Added to the Bottom, Older Stories Above
By Guff
In this crucial time for our country, I want to make one thing absolutely clear: if you don't hear it directly from me or my campaign, it's a lie. There are random nobodies out there, folks, spreading baseless stories and false narratives to deceive you.
We've seen this before, and we're seeing it again. These people spin their tales and twist the truth, but they can't fool us. We know the real America, and we understand what's at stake. That's why it's more important than ever to stay informed, stay vigilant, and trust only the truth coming from our campaign.
We're fighting for you, your families, and our great nation. We're standing up against lies, corruption, and deceit to ensure that every American voice is heard and every dream is protected.
Even people you think might be able to be trusted might not be, but I won't say any names. Remember, if you don't hear it from me, it's not to be trusted. Stick with us, stay strong, and together, we'll Keep America Great in 2028.
Thank you, and God bless America!
By Guff
**1. Comprehensive Coverage and Accessibility:**
- **Expanding Coverage:** GuffCare ensures that all Americans, especially low-income individuals and those with pre-existing conditions, have access to affordable healthcare. By implementing risk corridors, reinsurance programs, and high-risk pools, the plan stabilizes the insurance market, making it more robust and less susceptible to volatility.
- **Affordability and Subsidies:** GuffCare includes provisions for income-based subsidies and limits on out-of-pocket costs, protecting individuals from excessive medical expenses and making healthcare more affordable for everyone.
**2. Efficient Use of Resources:**
- **Reallocating Existing Funds:** GuffCare conducts a comprehensive review of current federal healthcare spending, reallocating funds from less efficient programs to support its initiatives. This ensures that taxpayer money is used effectively and efficiently.
- **Reducing Administrative Costs:** By modernizing administrative processes and implementing electronic health records (EHR) systems, GuffCare reduces bureaucracy and paperwork, saving time and resources for healthcare providers and patients.
**3. Focus on Innovation and Long-Term Sustainability:**
- **Funding for Research and Innovation:** GuffCare allocates funds for medical research and encourages public-private partnerships to drive healthcare innovation, leading to new treatments, technologies, and improved patient outcomes.
- **Preventive Care:** By funding preventive care programs and providing incentives for participation, GuffCare promotes long-term health and reduces the overall burden on the healthcare system.
**4. Transparency and Accountability:**
- **Public Disclosure of Drug Prices:** GuffCare requires that drug prices be publicly disclosed, ensuring transparency and allowing Americans to see how their tax dollars are being utilized. This prevents waste and promotes accountability in the healthcare system.
**5. Addressing Key Public Health Issues:**
- **Mental Health and Substance Abuse:** GuffCare includes provisions for mental health services and strategies to combat the opioid crisis, ensuring comprehensive support for affected individuals and communities.
- **Disease Prevention and Health Disparities:** GuffCare funds public health initiatives focused on disease prevention, health education, and emergency preparedness, addressing health disparities among underserved populations.
### Benefits for Politicians to Support and Pass GuffCare
**1. Meeting Public Demand:**
- The American public has consistently expressed the need for affordable, comprehensive, and high-quality healthcare. By supporting GuffCare, politicians can demonstrate that they are responsive to their constituents' needs and concerns.
**2. Long-Term Political Gain:**
- Passing GuffCare would position politicians as forward-thinking leaders committed to sustainable and effective healthcare reform. This can enhance their reputation and appeal to voters, particularly as the plan addresses both conservative and liberal priorities.
**3. Economic and Social Impact:**
- GuffCare's focus on reducing costs, improving efficiency, and promoting economic growth through healthcare innovation can lead to significant economic benefits. Politicians can leverage these positive outcomes to strengthen their policy platforms and campaign narratives.
**4. Transparency and Accountability:**
- By supporting a plan that emphasizes transparency, such as public disclosure of drug prices, politicians can align themselves with values of honesty and integrity. This can build trust with voters and differentiate them from opponents who may be seen as supporting opaque and inefficient systems.
**5. Repealing and Replacing Obamacare:**
- For those who have long advocated for the repeal and replacement of the ACA, GuffCare offers a viable and superior alternative. Supporting GuffCare allows politicians to fulfill campaign promises while providing a tangible solution that benefits all Americans.
*********************Conclusion****************************
GuffCare is a balanced and pragmatic approach to healthcare reform that addresses the shortcomings of the ACA while offering innovative solutions for the future. It is designed to be sustainable, transparent, and inclusive, ensuring that all Americans have access to the healthcare they need. Politicians who support and pass GuffCare will not only benefit their constituents but also position themselves as leaders committed to effective governance and long-term societal benefits.
Folks, let's break this down. We're living in an era where the Deep State – yes, the unelected bureaucrats, the globalist elites, and the shadowy figures – are exerting more control over our lives than ever before. They will do anything, and I mean anything, to keep Joe Biden in power. Why? Because he's their perfect puppet. Let's dive into the facts.
The Deep State isn't just a conspiracy theory. It's a tangible network of career bureaucrats, entrenched political operatives, and global elites who manipulate the levers of power to serve their interests. We're talking about people who aren't accountable to the voters, who operate behind closed doors, and who have an agenda that runs counter to the principles of American democracy.
These power brokers thrive on chaos and division. They feed off policies that erode our national sovereignty, weaken our borders, and undermine our economic stability. Their ultimate goal is a globalist utopia where the United States is just another cog in their machine.
Joe Biden: The Deep State's Ideal Candidate
Why Joe Biden? It's simple. Biden has spent decades in Washington, D.C., and has become a creature of the system. He is malleable, he is compliant, and he is the perfect figurehead for the Deep State's agenda. Let's look at his track record:
Flip-Flopping on Key Issues: Biden's history is a litany of changing positions to suit the political winds. Whether it's on crime, immigration, or trade, Biden has shown he's willing to say and do whatever it takes to stay in power.
Biden's Changing Stance on the Iraq War: Initially, Biden supported the Iraq War, voting in favor of the 2003 invasion. However, as public opinion turned against the war, Biden began to distance himself from his earlier stance, eventually calling it a mistake. This flip-flopping raises questions about his ability to make steadfast decisions in the face of political pressure.
Biden's Evolution on Immigration: Biden has shifted his position on immigration multiple times. During his early Senate years, he supported tough immigration measures. Later, as Vice President, he backed more lenient policies under the Obama administration. His current stance reflects a more progressive approach, but his past actions indicate a willingness to change positions based on political expediency.
Weak Leadership: Under Biden's administration, we've seen a dramatic increase in government spending, a crisis at our southern border, and a foreign policy that's anything but coherent. These aren't just policy failures – they're features of a presidency that's designed to serve the interests of the Deep State.
Government Spending Under Biden: Biden's administration has overseen significant increases in federal spending, contributing to the national debt. Critics argue that this spending spree has led to inflation and economic instability, further burdening American taxpayers.
Southern Border Crisis: The situation at the southern border has deteriorated under Biden's watch. His administration's policies have been criticized for encouraging illegal immigration, leading to overcrowded detention centers and a humanitarian crisis. The lack of a clear and effective strategy has exacerbated the problem.
Biden's Foreign Policy Challenges: Biden's foreign policy has been marked by inconsistency and blunders. From the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan to strained relations with key allies, his approach has been widely criticized for lacking coherence and foresight, weakening America's standing on the global stage.
Failed Policies: The 1994 Crime Bill, which he championed, led to mass incarceration and disproportionately affected minority communities. More recently, his handling of the Afghanistan withdrawal was a disaster, leading to chaos and undermining America's credibility on the global stage. These are just a few examples of how Biden's policies have failed in the past and continue to fail today.
Impact of the 1994 Crime Bill: The Crime Bill, authored by Biden, is often cited as a key factor in the rise of mass incarceration. It included provisions for harsher sentencing and expanded the use of the death penalty, disproportionately affecting minority communities and leading to a generation of social and economic hardships (source).
Afghanistan Withdrawal: The withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 was widely regarded as a fiasco. The rapid collapse of the Afghan government and the chaotic evacuation process highlighted a lack of planning and foresight, resulting in a humanitarian crisis and tarnishing America's reputation worldwide.
These examples illustrate how Biden's policies have not only failed to deliver positive outcomes but have also contributed to significant challenges facing the nation. His record of flip-flopping on key issues, weak leadership, and failed policies underscores his unsuitability as a leader who can effectively navigate the complexities of governance and uphold American values and interests.
Joe Biden's track record includes a series of remarks and actions that reflect poorly on his stance on racial issues. Here are some notable examples:
Busing and Segregation: In the 1970s, Biden opposed busing as a means to desegregate schools, working closely with segregationist senators like Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms. He once expressed fear that his children would grow up in a "racial jungle" if schools were integrated through busing (iHeart) (Washington Examiner).
Crime and Punishment: Biden was instrumental in passing legislation that disproportionately impacted minority communities. The 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act, which he co-wrote, created a severe sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine, contributing to the mass incarceration of Black Americans (iHeart).
Recent Gaffes:
In 2006, Biden remarked that you can't go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin' Donuts without an Indian accent (iHeart).
In 2007, he described Barack Obama as "the first sort of mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean" (iHeart).
During a 2019 campaign event, he said, "poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids" before correcting himself to say "wealthy kids, Black kids, Asian kids" (Washington Examiner).
Biden also made controversial comments regarding schools in Washington, D.C., stating that schools perform better in predominantly white areas because "there’s less than 1% of the population that is African American. There is probably less than 4 or 5% that are minorities" (The Knox Focus).
During a radio interview, Biden told a largely Black audience that if they were unsure of whether to vote for him or Trump, then "you ain't Black" (The Knox Focus).
He referred to his senior advisor Cedric Richmond, an African American, as "boy" (The Knox Focus).
These instances reveal a pattern of behavior and rhetoric that contradicts Biden's self-portrayal as a champion of racial equality. His long-standing relationships with segregationist senators and his role in legislation that harmed minority communities expose a hypocrisy that the Deep State conveniently overlooks to maintain their grip on power.
To maintain their grip on power, the Deep State employs a range of tactics:
Media Manipulation: The mainstream media, largely compliant and willing to push the Deep State's narrative, has become a tool for propaganda. They downplay scandals, distort facts, and attack anyone who dares to challenge their agenda.
Silencing Opposition: We've seen a disturbing trend of censorship and deplatforming aimed at silencing conservative voices. Whether it's through social media bans, IRS targeting, or bureaucratic red tape, the message is clear – dissent will not be tolerated.
Weaponizing Institutions: From the FBI to the IRS, government institutions are being used as weapons against political opponents. The goal is to intimidate and neutralize anyone who poses a threat to their power.
Some might argue that the Deep State is a mere figment of the imagination, a convenient scapegoat for those dissatisfied with the current administration. However, the evidence is clear:
Government Leaks: The Trump administration faced an unprecedented number of leaks, including sensitive national security information, suggesting an organized effort to undermine the presidency. The Republican-led Senate Homeland Security Committee found that these leaks were occurring "on a nearly daily basis" (Politico) (POLITICO).
Intelligence Community Actions: High-profile cases such as the resignation of Michael Flynn, Trump's former National Security Adviser, due to leaks from intelligence officials, indicate that elements within the government are willing to take drastic measures to influence political outcomes (The Independent).
Historical Precedent: Similar patterns of unaccountable power structures have been observed in other countries, and historically within the U.S., especially post-9/11 with the rise of a powerful and opaque security and intelligence apparatus (POLITICO).
So, what can we do? First, we need to stay informed and vigilant. The Deep State thrives on our ignorance and complacency. Second, we must support leaders who are committed to draining the swamp and restoring accountability to our government. Finally, we need to hold the media and our elected officials accountable. Demand transparency, demand honesty, and demand that our leaders serve us, the American people, not the interests of the Deep State.
Folks, the fight for our country's future is at a critical juncture. The Deep State is real, and its influence is pervasive. But with determination, vigilance, and a commitment to the truth, we can expose and dismantle this shadowy cabal. It's time to take our country back.
As we look towards the future, it's clear that America needs strong leadership to navigate these turbulent times. That's why I'm running for President in 2028. My campaign is built on principles of transparency, accountability, and putting America first. Together, we can drain the swamp, restore integrity to our government, and ensure that the interests of the American people come before those of the Deep State. Join me in this fight, and let's make America great again, together.
Welcome to the news section of our campaign website, where only truths are told!
Let's face it, folks: when we look at the data on crime, drug addiction, and homelessness, there's a clear trend. Blue states, governed predominantly by Democrats, often show higher rates in these critical areas compared to their red state counterparts. Today, we'll dive into the numbers and explore why this disparity exists, backed by solid sources.
It's no secret that crime rates are higher in many blue states. The correlation between urbanization, liberal policies, and rising crime is hard to ignore.
Urbanization and Population Density: Blue states have more urban centers. Cities like New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles are bustling hubs, but they also come with higher crime rates. More people, more crime—it’s a simple equation.
Liberal Policies: Policies that are more lenient on crime, such as bail reform and sanctuary city policies, contribute to higher crime rates. These policies, while well-intentioned, often have unintended consequences.
According to the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, cities in blue states consistently report higher violent crime rates compared to those in red states. The data speaks for itself: cities with stricter enforcement and tougher penalties see less crime.
The opioid epidemic and other drug-related crises have hit blue states particularly hard. Let’s break down why this happens.
Opioid Crisis: States like California and New York are epicenters of the opioid crisis. The combination of high availability of drugs and lenient enforcement policies exacerbates the problem.
Healthcare and Reporting: Blue states often have better healthcare systems, which means higher rates of reporting drug addiction. While this might seem like a good thing, it also indicates that the problem is more pervasive.
The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) reports higher overdose death rates in blue states. It's clear that more comprehensive healthcare doesn't always mean fewer drug problems—it often means we're just seeing the full extent of the issue.
Homelessness is another area where blue states are struggling, and the reasons are multifaceted.
Housing Affordability: Cities in blue states, like San Francisco and Los Angeles, have some of the highest housing costs in the country. High rent and property prices push more people onto the streets.
Economic Policies: While blue states may offer more economic opportunities on paper, the gap between the rich and the poor is wider, leading to higher homelessness rates.
Social Services: Blue states provide extensive social services, which paradoxically attract more homeless individuals from other regions, increasing the visible homeless population.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) reports that blue states like California and New York have some of the highest homelessness rates. The policies intended to help often end up drawing more individuals in need, creating a vicious cycle.
The evidence is clear: blue states, despite their progressive intentions, often struggle more with crime, drug addiction, and homelessness. Urbanization, lenient policies, and high costs of living contribute to these challenges. The data from sources like the FBI, NIDA, and HUD consistently show that blue states face higher rates in these critical areas.
We need to have an honest conversation about the effectiveness of policies and look at what's working—and what's not. Until then, the disparity between blue and red states on these issues will continue to be a significant point of contention.
As we approach the 2028 election, it's time to take a stand. Guff is running for President with a commitment to tackling these critical issues head-on. With a focus on America First policies, economic prosperity, and strong national defense, we can make a real difference.
Keep America Great by ensuring safe streets, combating drug addiction, and providing real solutions to homelessness. Join Guff's campaign and be part of the movement to bring effective governance back to our great nation.
Support the Vision for a Better AmericaYour support is crucial. Spread the word, volunteer, and donate to help us bring about the change we need. Let's Keep America Great in 2028!
By Guff | June 19, 2024
The health and cognitive abilities of President Joe Biden have come under increasing scrutiny as new incidents and reports raise concerns about his ability to effectively lead the nation. The 81-year-old president has had a series of high-profile gaffes and mishaps that have fueled speculation about his mental acuity and physical health.
Public Gaffes and Confusion
Biden’s recent public appearances have been marred by numerous verbal slip-ups and moments of apparent confusion. During a speech last week, the president referred to his Vice President Kamala Harris as "President Harris" for the third time since taking office. Additionally, during a press conference in April, Biden struggled to recall the name of his Defense Secretary, Lloyd Austin, referring to him simply as "the guy who runs that outfit over there".
Medical History and Transparency Issues
President Biden’s medical history has also raised eyebrows. Although the White House has released periodic health summaries, critics argue that these reports lack comprehensive details. In his latest health summary, Biden’s physician acknowledged his stiff gait but attributed it to spinal arthritis, without addressing cognitive concerns.
Moreover, during his last physical examination, there were no cognitive tests reported, sparking criticism from medical experts and political opponents who argue that these tests are essential given Biden’s age.
Polls and Public Opinion
A recent poll by ABC News/Washington Post revealed that 58% of Americans are concerned about Biden’s mental sharpness, with only 39% believing he is fit for the demands of the presidency. These numbers reflect growing unease among the public and underscore the importance of transparency regarding the president’s health.
Political Ramifications
The implications of Biden’s perceived cognitive decline are significant. With the 2024 election cycle already in motion, potential Democratic challengers and Republican opponents are likely to use these concerns as a focal point in their campaigns. Former President Donald Trump has frequently targeted Biden’s mental fitness, dubbing him "Sleepy Joe" and questioning his ability to handle the pressures of the presidency.
Expert Opinions
Dr. Marc Siegel, a clinical professor of medicine and a frequent commentator on medical issues, has voiced his concerns. "While it's not uncommon for older adults to experience some cognitive decline, it is crucial for the leader of the free world to be fully transparent about their health," Siegel stated in a recent interview.
Videos and "CheapFakes" Controversy
The media landscape has also played a significant role in this ongoing narrative. Numerous unedited videos showing Biden’s cognitive lapses have been circulated widely online. These videos, often highlighting moments of confusion or forgetfulness, have been labeled as "CheapFakes" by some media outlets. Unlike deepfakes, which involve sophisticated alterations, "CheapFakes" refer to genuine footage that is unedited but presented in a way that emphasizes the subject’s weaknesses. This term has been used to dismiss concerns, suggesting that the videos are misleading despite being unaltered.
For example, a clip of Biden appearing to lose his train of thought during a town hall meeting was widely shared and criticized. The mainstream media, however, downplayed its significance, categorizing it under the "CheapFakes" label and arguing that such moments are taken out of context to create a false narrative.
Conclusion
As questions about President Biden’s health and cognitive abilities continue to mount, the American people deserve full transparency. The office of the president demands the utmost mental and physical capabilities, and it is imperative that any concerns be addressed openly and honestly. The coming months will undoubtedly see increased scrutiny and calls for more detailed health disclosures from the White House.
You won't believe this, but Sleepy Joe Biden is at it AGAIN, and this time he's gone WAY too far! Just a week before the shocking assassination attempt on President Trump, Biden said, "we need to put Donald Trump in a Bullseye" (source: Patriot Daily). Can you BELIEVE that? This is the so-called leader of our country, practically inciting violence against our great President! 😡
Now, let's connect the dots here. Is it any surprise that after such a reckless and downright STUPID statement, someone would take action? Biden knows EXACTLY why Trump was targeted and almost killed, and it's time we hold him ACCOUNTABLE for his dangerous rhetoric!
We've got to STOP playing games, folks. Biden's incompetence and stupidity are not just embarrassing— they're downright dangerous. It's time for America to wake up and demand better. No more excuses, no more nonsense. We need REAL leadership, not this utter madness! 🇺🇸💪
#HoldBidenAccountable #Trump2024 #StopTheStupidity #AmericaFirst #MAGA
In a shocking turn of events, Sleepy Joe Biden is at it again, and this time he’s gone way too far! Just a week before the attempted assassination on President Trump, Biden was reported to have said, “we need to put Donald Trump in a Bullseye” (source: Patriot Daily). Can you believe that? This is the so-called leader of our country, practically inciting violence against our great President!
Now, let’s connect the dots here. Is it any surprise that after such a reckless and downright stupid statement, someone would take action? Biden knows exactly why Trump was targeted and almost killed, and it’s time we hold him accountable for his dangerous rhetoric!
But this isn't the first time a Democratic leader has made incendiary comments against Republicans. Let’s not forget when Maxine Waters told supporters to confront Trump officials wherever they see them. In June 2018, Waters said, “If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” Such statements can easily be seen as incitements to harassment and violence.
Similarly, Cory Booker once told an audience in 2018 to “get up in the face of some congresspeople.” Such aggressive rhetoric contributes to a hostile political climate where violence becomes more likely.
Even Hillary Clinton has made controversial statements, saying in October 2018, "You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about." Such language only deepens the divide and increases tensions between parties.
Then there was the infamous incident in 2017 when a Bernie Sanders supporter opened fire on Republican congressmen practicing for a charity baseball game, critically wounding House Majority Whip Steve Scalise. This horrific event highlighted the very real consequences of heated political rhetoric.
Nancy Pelosi also came under fire in 2020 when she referred to federal law enforcement officers as “stormtroopers.” Such dehumanizing language can contribute to an environment where violence against law enforcement is more likely.
Let’s also recall when former Attorney General Eric Holder said in 2018, “When they go low, we kick them.” This statement clearly advocates for a more aggressive and confrontational approach, which can easily escalate into physical altercations.
In 2016, Tim Kaine, Hillary Clinton's running mate, urged supporters to “fight in the streets” against Trump and his agenda. Such statements are dangerously close to inciting public disorder and violence.
The media has not been innocent either. CNN commentator Chris Cuomo in 2019 seemed to justify the use of violence against political opponents by saying, “fighting against hate matters.” This type of rhetoric from influential figures in the media can further inflame tensions and lead to violent confrontations.
In another instance, Representative Joaquin Castro in 2019 tweeted a list of names and employers of Trump donors in San Antonio, Texas. This move was widely criticized as doxxing, which can lead to harassment and threats against private citizens simply for their political beliefs.
In 2018, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said, "We’re here to resist everything that President Trump stands for." While this statement may not directly incite violence, the persistent use of confrontational language by multiple Democratic leaders contributes to a charged and potentially volatile political atmosphere.
Also noteworthy is when Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said in 2020, "The whole point of protesting is to make people uncomfortable." Such a stance can embolden individuals to engage in more aggressive and potentially violent actions during protests.
Another example is when Kamala Harris said during an interview in 2020 that the protests "are not going to stop" and should not stop, even after Election Day. While expressing support for peaceful protests, the language used can be interpreted as encouraging continuous and potentially confrontational demonstrations.
We can also look at when Elizabeth Warren, in 2019, declared that Democrats should “fight like hell” against Republicans. Such statements further fuel the fire of political animosity and can be perceived as a call to arms.
Moreover, in 2019, Ilhan Omar compared ICE detention centers to concentration camps, a statement that can incite extreme reactions and actions against immigration enforcement officers.
In 2021, during the confirmation hearings for Brett Kavanaugh, numerous Democratic leaders called for vehement opposition, with some supporters taking these calls to an extreme by harassing and doxxing Republican senators.
In 2020, Julian Castro, a former presidential candidate, tweeted that it was time for Americans to "fight back against a corrupt and illegitimate president." Such statements can embolden individuals to take extreme measures.
During the 2020 protests, Mayor Jenny Durkan of Seattle described the CHOP (Capitol Hill Occupied Protest) zone, which saw instances of violence and lawlessness, as a "block party atmosphere." This downplaying of serious issues can contribute to a lack of order and safety.
In 2018, Rep. Ted Lieu tweeted, “I would love to be able to regulate the content of speech. The First Amendment prevents me from doing so.” While not directly inciting violence, this statement highlights an ongoing struggle with respecting opposing views, which can escalate tensions.
In 2017, a protester at a Democratic Socialists of America meeting in Seattle declared that the city’s police department should be abolished and replaced by community-based security. This extreme rhetoric contributes to the broader narrative of hostility towards law enforcement.
In 2019, Rep. Ayanna Pressley called for unrest in the streets in response to Trump administration policies, stating, "There needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there’s unrest in our lives." Such statements can encourage public disorder and violence.
In 2020, a Bernie Sanders campaign staffer was caught on video advocating for violent revolution if Sanders did not win the Democratic nomination, further showcasing the potential dangers of extremist rhetoric.
We can also point to the incident where a protester at a 2016 Trump rally punched a Trump supporter, following aggressive anti-Trump rhetoric from various Democratic figures. Such actions demonstrate how heated political rhetoric can manifest in real-world violence.
In 2019, during a protest against an ICE facility, a group of demonstrators used a homemade bomb to attack the building, inspired by anti-ICE and anti-Trump rhetoric. This incident shows the dangerous consequences of extreme language.
During the 2020 George Floyd protests, several Democratic leaders voiced support for the protests but did not condemn the accompanying violence, looting, and destruction of property, which some interpreted as tacit approval of the chaos.
In 2017, following Trump’s inauguration, Madonna told a crowd she had thought “an awful lot about blowing up the White House.” While she later said it was a metaphor, such statements can incite extreme reactions from listeners.
In 2018, a group of protesters chased Senator Ted Cruz out of a restaurant, yelling and harassing him. This incident is part of a broader pattern of public confrontations encouraged by some Democratic leaders’ rhetoric.
In 2019, Rashida Tlaib used profane language to call for Trump's impeachment, saying, "We’re gonna impeach the motherf***er!" Such language can heighten tensions and contribute to a culture of hostility.
In 2020, after the killing of George Floyd, several Democratic leaders, including Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar, expressed support for the protests without condemning the violence that occurred, potentially encouraging further unrest.
In 2019, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez likened the border detention facilities to "concentration camps," which can incite strong emotional responses and potentially aggressive actions against those running the facilities.
We’ve got to stop playing games, folks. Biden’s incompetence and stupidity are not just embarrassing—they’re downright dangerous. It’s time for America to wake up and demand better. No more excuses, no more nonsense. We need real leadership, not this utter madness!
Stay tuned to GNN (Guff News Network) for more updates on this developing story.
We use cookies to improve your experience and to help us understand how you use our site. Please refer to our cookie notice and privacy statement for more information regarding cookies and other third-party tracking that may be enabled.
Together, we will KEEP AMERICA GREAT! Join us in our fight to put America First, rebuild our nation, and ensure a prosperous future for every American. Thank you for your support and dedication to our cause. Stay strong, stay patriotic, and stay connected with our campaign.
AI-Generated Content and Images: Some of the content and images on this site may be generated using AI. While we strive for accuracy, some images might have typos. We apologize for any errors, but these pictures still make a powerful statement alongside the words. We're using the best technology out there to KEEP AMERICA GREAT and bring you the most up-to-date information. It's all part of our commitment to innovation and excellence. Believe me, it's going to be YUGE!
Dynamic Site: Just like our campaign, this site is dynamic and constantly evolving. Updates and changes may occur at any time to ensure we provide the best and most up-to-date information. Stay tuned, stay informed, and remember, your support is crucial for a greater America.
Announcement Edits: Some announcements will be edited once they happen or if anything changes. Stay tuned for updates, folks! We’re committed to keeping you informed with the latest and greatest information. Trust me, we’ve got this covered!
Solo Effort: I am currently the only person working on this site and campaign. Please bear with me as I continue to develop and improve our content and outreach. Your patience and support are greatly appreciated!
Early Stages: This site is in the very, very early stages, having just been created on June 8th, 2024. Please be patient as we build and improve our platform. Your support is crucial, and we appreciate your understanding during this development phase!
Opinions May Change: Opinions may change or adapt over time as I learn more or become aware of something I was unaware of before. This is all part of growing and ensuring that we make the best decisions for our great nation. Trust me, folks, I’m always looking out for America’s best interests.
Contact Us: Guff4Pres2028@gmail.com
We mostly use X but plan on adding more soon!